EEGsignatureAttentionCueToSpeak

AllData

These folders contain all the data for all three experiments - thus response latencies (reading latency Exp1, reading/repetition Exp2, LDT in Exp3) and EEG data (raw and cleaned data used for analyses).

Analyses

Analysis scripts for all three experiments separately. These include matlab scripts to do ERP, TFR and power analyses.

Experiments

Experiment scripts in Presentation and stimuli for all three experiments (Exp1: reading aloud, Exp2: reading aloud/repetition, Exp3: LDT)

Details

Title: EEGsignatureAttentionCueToSpeak
Genre: Cognitive Science
Neurobiology
Psycholinguistics
Language: Dutch
Persistent Identifier: https://hdl.handle.net/1839/215616e0-6212-46b5-9e08-d5f073f0e524
Description: Research project ‘Planning for Language Production: The Electrophysiological Signature of Attention to the Cue to Speak’ from Suzanne Jongman, Vitoria Piai and Antje Meyer.

Detailed Metadata

expand all

MPI_Collection
- Title : EEGsignatureAttentionCueToSpeak
- DataType : Audio recordings
- DataType : Behavioural data
- DataType : EEG data
- DataType : Linguistic annotations
- DataType : Reaction time data
- ResearchField : Cognitive Science
- ResearchField : Neurobiology
- ResearchField : Psycholinguistics
- Date : 2019-08-23
- Description
  Description : Research project ‘Planning for Language Production: The Electrophysiological Signature of Attention to the Cue to Speak’ from Suzanne Jongman, Vitoria Piai and Antje Meyer.
- Contributor
  Name : Suzanne Jongman
  
  Role : researcher
- Institution
  Department : Psychology of Language
  
  Organisation : Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
- Project
  ProjectName : EEG Signature of Attention to the Cue to Speak
  
  ProjectDescription : In conversation, speech planning can overlap with listening to the interlocutor. It has been postulated that as soon as there is enough information to formulate a response, planning is initiated and the response is maintained in working memory. Concurrently, the auditory input is monitored for the turn end such that the response can be launched promptly. In three EEG experiments, we aimed to identify the neural signature of phonological planning and monitoring by comparing delayed responding to not responding (reading aloud, repetition and lexical decision). These comparisons consistently resulted in a sustained positivity and beta power reduction over posterior regions. We argue that these effects reflect attention to the sequence end. Response planning and maintenance were not detected in the neural signature even though it is highly likely these were taking place. This suggests that EEG cannot be used to identify response planning when the neural signal is overridden by attention effects.
- Content_Language
  Name : Dutch
  
  Id : ISO639-3:nld